Bike Lanes Will Be Old News For New Mayor, Survey Says

Written by Adam Lisberg on . Posted in Daily, Transportation.





Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s aggressive reshaping of New York City’s streets and sidewalks has earned big praise from groups that want to take public space away from cars – and big fears that his successor will give voice to a backlash.

So Transportation Alternatives, the nonprofit that encourages biking, walking and mass transit instead of driving, is trying to shape the 2013 mayoral dialogue over getting around the city before it even starts.

To influence next year’s mayoral candidates, the organization is meeting with them to show detailed results of a survey by Penn Schoen Berland – Bloomberg’s pollster of choice – of 600 residents with a history of voting regularly. Their demographics matched the city as a whole; a majority owned a car, a minority owned a bike and most of them were lifelong city residents.

And most of them support bike lanes.

“We learned a lot from talking to habitual voters,” said Noah Budnick, Transportation Alternatives’ deputy director.

Across the city, the poll showed 60 percent of New Yorkers support bike lanes – even among car owners. In Brooklyn and Queens, support was 63 percent; among black voters, it reached 69 percent.

Equally encouraging for Transportation Alternatives: 64 percent of voters see more New Yorkers biking in the next five years, and 76 percent want to increase or maintain the number of bike lanes.

“If you’re in your 50s, then it’s a new thing if you’ve been driving since you were in your 20s,” said Brodie Enoch, who does community outreach on public transit for Transportation Alternatives. “But it’s less of a new thing. People are getting used to them.”

Former Congressman Anthony Weiner became a poster child for resisting those changes when the New York Times reported he told Bloomberg at a 2010 dinner, “When I become mayor, you know what I’m going to spend my first year doing? I’m going to have a bunch of ribbon-cuttings tearing out your [expletive] bike lanes.”

But as Transportation Alternatives shows its survey results to likely mayoral candidates, it uses its hard numbers to make the case that Bloomberg’s street changes are popular despite the cries of a vocal minority of opponents.

“We need to get inside the heads of the candidates and think about what they’re thinking about,” Budnick said. “Nobody has a platform written out yet. Good politicians welcome you in and are open to ideas.”

The survey asked about more than bike lanes, though. Wide majorities of voters want the NYPD to be tougher on speeding and reckless driving. Among car owners, 41 percent drive less than once a week.

And when voters were asked a series of questions about issues facing New York City, 83 percent said preserving mass transit was very important – second only to the 96 percent who felt that way about creating jobs, and far above the 51 percent who said reducing traffic congestion was very important.

Asked who deserves the most blame for mass transit service cuts, 35 percent said the mayor – even though he has no authority over the MTA – compared to 23 percent for the state Legislature, 17 percent for the City Council and 7 percent for Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

As the MTA seeks more money to pay for construction projects in advance of a scheduled fare hike next year – and as transportation planners continue to push for bridge tolls or congestion pricing to pay for them – Transportation Alternatives hopes candidates will use their poll as a guide for how to get ahead of public sentiment.

“If the way to become mayor is to get votes, then the way they’re going to get them is to be the transit mayor,” Budnick said. “Running against bikes and safe streets is going to lose votes.”





Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trackback from your site.

  • Tax’em

    If the city decides to advance the bike lane’ers agenda then bicyclist should 1) forced to be insured 2) pay a fee to own a bike (fee could be used to support mass transit) 3) take a basic street safety class 4) learn that the pedestrian in the cross walk always has the right of way. and 5) be fined if they are not wearing a reflective jacket when biking at night.

  • Steve

    So far this year cyclists have killed zero people. Motorists were responsible for over two dozen deaths in January and February, and some of the people killed were pedestrians in crosswalks with the right of way.

    If anyone needs more rigorous licensing, education, and higher fees for bringing their vehicles into hugely congested areas of the city, it’s drivers.

    • Brooklyn

      WRONG IF YOU THINK BIKERS DO NOT CRITICALLY INJURE PEOPLE. During good weather months every week dozens of victims are taken by ambulance just from Central Park and Prospect Park. Right now there is a woman who has been in a coma for months after being hit by a reckless speeding biker in Prospect Park. The City simply does not keep those statistics. And the City does not want those statistics kept because they do not serve the anti people who need cars agenda of Bloomberg and his Luddite Transportation Commissioner.

      • Truth Serum

        I call bullshit. Yes, there were a couple serious incidents in Prospect Park, and like anyone else, cyclists should ride with care and respect for others. But neither of the two women injured seriously in Prospect Park last year is still in a coma, and no one ever assigned fault in those crashes. As for Luddites, take a look in the mirror, champ.

  • lookbothways

    Pedestrians should also learn to look both ways, and cross at crosswalks. Oh and don’t mention drivers who don’t look when turning right into a bike lane, or throw their doors open.

    • Brooklyn

      And lets not forget the fools who ride their bikes in a car’s blind spot between the moving car and the curb as the driver makes a right turn.

  • Dangerous Pedestrians

    I wonder why Tax ‘Em does suggest that we force pedestrians to take the same steps. Why shouldn’t they (i) be insured in case they negligently step into a car or bicycle lane, (ii) pay a fee to walk around the city, (iii) take a safety class, (iv) learn not to jaywalk, to look both ways before crossing the street, etc.; and (v) wear flashing neon lights when out walking, particularly when crossing the street.

    Why? Because cars, bicycles, mass transit and walking are all separate modes of transportation and should be treated differently! Calling bikes “vehicles” may be administratively convenient, but it does not square with how they function. Bike lanes should have their own lights (that are not timed the same as car lanes), penalties should be commensurate with the danger presented and because the ramifications of being hit by a bike are generally less severe than being hit by a car, the penalty should be lower, etc.

    • Brooklyn

      Clearly, you have never been hit by a bike going 20 mph or more. You have never seen the ugly consequences. Being slammed at 20 mph by at least 170 pounds or more of biker and bike is a serious hit.

  • Brooklyn

    Problem is that they are not taking anything away from cars. Cars have nothing to be taken. They are taking away transportation choices from PEOPLE WHO NEED TO USE CARS. The use the word cars in order to cover up the fact that the real victims are PEOPLE and businesses. They are discriminating against PEOPLE in cars. It is nice to have toys and to play with toys when you can. Not everyone’s hobby involves playing in traffic. Not everyone is going to hump a bicycle fifteen miles a day to go to and from their jobs because they also are into biking for fun and physical workout. Everyone knows these polls by Transportation Alternatives are cooked push polls. Ask anyone if they want more recreation; of course they will answer yes. Ask the same individuals who are frustrated by the traffic congestion bike lanes and other anti people in cars tactics of Sadik-Khan if they like it, and they will say no.

    • Henz

      You may be surprised by how few people “need” to use cars.

      For example: in the UK nearly 25% of all car trips are less than two miles [1]. For a slow cyclist this will take 15 minutes, for a slow walker ~30 minutes. Unless the driver is disabled or transporting large quantities there is no “need” to drive.

      I have not found any USA statistics, however I expect that the equivalent is true, especially considering that the USA is typically considered to be more car centric and car dependent than the UK.

      These drivers could also consider public transport and enjoy a chat, or the daily paper, rather than seething in a traffic jam.

      Cycle lanes do not “discriminate against” drivers, however you may find that wide, car filled streets, discriminate against people on foot or on bicycles. Cycle lanes may in fact make car journeys more reliable, by reducing the number of people in cars (who are the ones who actually slow other drivers down).

      So next time you see a cycle lane, be thankful that the happy & safe cyclists using it are not sitting in a car in front of you, but are getting fresh air and exercise, freeing up hospital beds, boosting the economy and making your city a nicer and more people friendly place to live.

      Why not try cycling next week? You’ll love it, honest!

      [1] http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Environmentandgreenerliving/Greenertravel/Greenercarsanddriving/DG_191253

  • Truth Serum

    Iris, why don’t you drop the “Brooklyn” cover already.

  • prospect park

    Great article. New Yorkers want more bike lanes!

  • prospect park

    Everyone in my city had to pass driver’s ed and take a basic swim test to graduate public high school, even though many of my fellow students never swam and never drove the rest of their lives.

    It wouldn’t be unreasonable to require all public school students to take a basic bicycling skills class. It would increase cycling and safety. Good idea, Tax’Em!

  • Pingback: Morning Read: NYers Back Police Over Spying; Cuomo, Lawmakers on Collision Course; Poll Drop for Obama | Politicker

  • Pingback: Grand River » Archives » Facilities Statistics