Brook-Krasny Study Adds Fuel To Idea Of Fidler Challenging Golden

Written by Chris Bragg on . Posted in Blog.





Alec Brook-Krasny

The office of Assemblyman Alec Brook-Krasny released a study over the weekend (translated in full from Russian to English here) showing that Democratic Councilman Lew Fidler and Republican David Storobin essentially broke even among the Russian community in their Mar. 20 special election — but that Fidler got trounced in Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods that were outside his Council district.

So no matter how the counting of paper ballots ends up in the closely contested race (Storobin currently leads by 119 votes), the data would seem to add fuel to the idea that Fidler would be better off challenging State Sen. Marty Golden — whose new Senate district contains much of Fidler’s current Council district — rather than running in the new “Super-Jewish” Senate district this fall. A Golden challenge is a prospect Fidler has been discussing with advisers for weeks.

Brook-Krasny’s study showed that Storobin more than doubled Fidler’s vote total in heavily Orthodox Borough Park, while handily defeating Storobin in Fidler’s own Council district.

Brook-Krasny goes out of his way to note that his data is based on information from the Board of Elections, not upon his own spin. Clearly, Brook-Krasny, a key Russian-American supporter of Fidler, has a vested interest in showing that Fidler performed decently against Storobin, who is Russian-American, in that community.

The opposite spin is being put out by a local Russian-language radio station, DaNu Radio 87.7, which recently released its own exit-polling claiming that Russian-speaking voters broke for Storobin by a margin of 65 to 35 percent. The station is a competitor of a station own by Gregory Davidzon, a key Fidler supporter.

(A Facebook post by Brook-Krasny related to the study was noted this morning by the Politicker.)

Here’s an excerpt from the RUNY Web article on the Brook-Krasny release:

“In the part of the 46th Assembly district, which is represented by Alec Brook-Krasny, voter turnout was quite high. This part of the district includes neighborhoods populated mostly by Russian-speaking Americans: Brighton Beach, Beach Haven, Trump Village and Warbass Development. Here the votes are as follows: Lew Fidler – 1723; David Storobin  - 1737. The numbers show the votes divided  almost evenly, with a difference of just 14 votes.

Since in this district the voters were, almost certainly, Russian-speaking, we can safely state the fact that in the Russian-speaking community the popularity of both candidates is basically equal.

As for the 45th district, which boasted the highest voter turnout, Storobin has gathered 3638, and Fidler – 2753 votes. A quite large part of voters in the district are Jewish Orthodox.

The 47th district, which includes Bensonhurst with its large population of  “Russians”, has brought Fidler 935 votes, and Storobin – 945. So, again basically even.

The 48th Assembly district, which includes Boro Park, a known Orthodox neighborhood, has shown support for David Storobin by giving him 1008 votes. Fidler has received 458 votes there, or less than a half.

The 59th district is Lew Fidler’s home turf. Voters there have unreservedly supported their City Council representative by giving him 1584 votes compared to only 614 – to his opponent. This balance clearly shows that Lew Fidler’s representation in the City Council hasn’t disappointed the population of his district, or they wouldn’t have voted for him during the Senate elections.

These numbers allow one to claim that the Russian-speakers’ votes for Lew Fidler and David Storobin are divided almost evenly. Storobin’s advantage of 119 votes after the preliminary count is due to the strong support from the Jewish Orthodox community.

This is the official statistics, supported by mathematics. There is no place here for fantasies and fiction. We can safely draw a conclusion: if David Storobin becomes a senator, his victory will hardly be owed to the Russian-speaking community.

There is a paradoxical situation here: Russian-speaking Storobin’s  support came overwhelmingly from the Ultra-Orthodox, and not the Russian-American street. 

Our question about who will gain from David Storobin’s victory was answered by the State Assembly member Alec Brook-Krasny:  “My answer is clear: today the winner is not the Russian-speaking community, nor even the Orthodox, who were planning on electing their own Orthodox representative, but only David Storobin himself. Of course, he made his name in the elections, which is an achievement I congratulate him with.”

Alec Brook-Krasny also told us about his conversation with his Republican colleagues during the Vietnam Veterans  Ceremony in Bay Ridge: “They reinforced my opinions on David Storobin’s role in these elections, opinions I presented in my latest RUNYweb.com interview. They do face a problem of what to do with Storobin afterwards.”





Trackback from your site.

  • BT

    Whats the obsession with Colin Campbell and now Chris covering this non-story? Fidler has not admitted interest in the seat. There is an existing Democratic challenger to Golden who is young but even more qualified than the fella who beat Fidler last week. He outraised any contender in years. But every story I read seems to pretend he does not exist. Its either lazy journalism or an effort to spur another dirty race that serves ad sales more than the public.

  • http://www.citizensmagazine.com Ilya

    “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Mark Twain. This “statistic” is nothing to do with reality. Alec completely lost the race Fidler – Storobin. Almost all Russins did vote for Storobin. Just one example. He wrote; “ussian-speaking Americans: Brighton Beach, Beach Haven, Trump Village and Warbass Development. Here the votes are as follows: Lew Fidler – 1723; David Storobin – 1737. The numbers show the votes divided almost evenly, with a difference of just 14 votes.”. Let’s assume for a second there are correct numbers. How many liberal Jewish voters live there? A LOT. Probably 30-40 %. And all of them vote for democrats. And all of them are really active voters. So, use your math skills to calculate ratio. The real “Russian” district is Brighton Beach (Shorefront) – and Storobin won there, I can debate with Alec about it, specially I am a professional engineer a work every day with real numbers and real science. But he is not interesting. Fidler lost Russian, Alec did his pro-Fidler speeches on the radio almost every day. He can not loose, that is why he tries to show all of us that he is not a looser.

  • http://www.journalisk.com journalisk

    @BT: HOW is the result of a contentious Senate race in a changing district a non-story? Are you trying to be insulting? And Golden’s other challenger would be different story, you realize that. Now I can’t even follow up on it because you didn’t leave a name. That’s lazy journalism. You also made accusations of a dirty race, and didn’t back that up. That’s libel, technically, although with all this lazy journalism, who counts anymore? Also Chris posted a link to an article in this publication about the fact that Fidler may be eyeing Golden’s seat, and THAT article lists Andrew Gounardes: you accused him of not citing his sources, but he cited yours. I’ll put it down to the fact that perhaps you support Gounardes: what are his qualifications? Does anyone know how young Gounardes managed to climb so high? Impressive.
    @CB, thanks for posting the results! And picking up on this part of the story.

  • Pingback: Roundup: We Are Trayvon; Budget Negotiations; Santorum’s Conditions | Politicker