GOP Senate Hopeful Worked For Controversial Dartmouth Newspaper [UPDATED]

Written by Andrew J. Hawkins on . Posted in Campaigns/Elections, Daily.





Wendy Long

As she travels the state racking up support and endorsements from local Republican and Conservative party chairs, Wendy Long is emerging a serious contender in the race to challenge U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in November.

But her ties to a Dartmouth College newspaper that routinely courted controversy by mocking black, gay, Jewish and female students could complicate her quest for the Senate.

The Dartmouth Review was founded in 1980 by students disenchanted with the college’s support of co-education, affirmative action and 1960’s liberalism. Long was a member of the inaugural staff, along with future conservative luminary Dinesh D’Souza. She graduated in 1982, but continued to serve the newspaper as a member of its board of trustees. The paper quickly earned a reputation for sharp-elbowed conservatism, a combative attitude and a reputation for mischief.

During its first year, the Review sponsored a free lobster-and-champagne feast to coincide with a campus fast for the world’s hungry. It published a list of members in the school’s Gay Students Association, and allegedly sent letters to the students’ parents about their children’s lifestyle. In 1982, it ran a column in “black English” suggesting African-American students were illiterate.

Yet no controversy echoed as loudly as when it ran a quotation from Adolf Hitler on Yom Kippur.

In October 1990, the Hanover, N.H.-based college erupted after the Review included the quote from Hitler’s biography Mein Kampf in its masthead on the first day of the Jewish day of atonement. The quote included the sentence, “By warding off the Jews, I am fighting for the Lord’s work.”

Hundreds of students turned out the following week to protest the paper. And when it came time for the Review to issue an apology, it turned to trustee Wendy Long. 

Long – then known by her maiden name Wendy Stone – appeared at a combative press conference with fellow trustee D’Souza to address the incident. Long and D’Souza apologized, but ultimately blamed it on “a criminal act of sabotage.”

A follow-up investigation by the Anti-Defamation League concluded the quote was the work one or more staffers at the Review. Investigators deemed it “unquestionably an anti-Semitic act.” Long was not involved in the editorial department at the time. Several staff and board members resigned after the incident.

Richard Glovsky, the attorney who led the investigation, said he had no recollection of Long being directly involved in the incident. He did say, though, that the newspaper had fostered a “climate” of anti-Semitism, and that the quote’s inclusion was part of a “malicious pattern” of hate speech

Brian Ellner, a Dartmouth student at the time who helped organize the protest, recalled arguing with D’Souza over his request to address the anti-Review rally. Ellner, who as a senior strategist at the Human Rights Campaign was an instrumental figure in last year’s push to legalize same-sex marriage in New York, said that his conversation with D’Souza and his associates quickly descended into “a shouting match.” According to press accounts, Long was also in Hanover with D’Souza.

“Dinesh called me that morning and asked if he could speak,” Ellner recalled. “They wanted to defend the Review or claim that the insertion of the Hitler quote was sabotage. I said that it would not be possible.”

“The only people who were involved with the Review on a board-level, or really any level in those days, were extreme,” he added, “particularly those who stayed on in the aftermath of the Hitler quote incident.”

UPDATE: After this story was published, D’Souza responded by defending his and Long’s tenure at the review, and denying that the paper was involved in outing gay and lesbian students to their parents. “There are a lot of rumors about the Review floating around–some of these were falsely generated when we were students,” he said in an email.

Long made a cameo in an earlier controversial incident involving the Dartmouth Review. In 1986, seven students associated with the newspaper were suspended after attacking anti-apartheid shanties on campus with sledgehammers. Protesters built the shantytown to dramatize the poverty of black South Africans. The Review students who knocked them down said they wanted to beautify the campus, but critics claimed they were racially motivated. A fundraiser was held in Washington, D.C. to benefit the suspended students.

At the time, Long was press secretary to New Hampshire Sen. Gordon Humphrey, who attended the fundraiser. She told reporters that $7,000 was raised for the suspended students, which indirectly went to support the Dartmouth Review.

Long declined to be interviewed for this story, but her spokesman David Catalfamo released this statement: “Wendy Long has been actively involved in advancing Republican-conservative ideals since her days as a student at Dartmouth. She is proud of her association with the Dartmouth Review and her lifelong work promoting the protection of individual liberties and a reverence for the constitution. Any suggestion that true conservative engagement is somehow consistent with or promotes racism, anti-Semitism or any other discriminatory view is repugnant and false.”

Gordon Haff, a co-founder of the Review, said Long was a key member of the team. Haff said while their intention was often noble, missteps were made along the way that undermined the paper’s legacy.

“There were mistakes made,” Haff said, referring to the Hitler quote and others. “In retrospect, with the advantage of hindsight, we shouldn’t have done some of those things.”

Long most recently worked as an attorney for the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network. From that perch, she emerged as a vocal opponent to the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. She served as an aide to several Republican senators, and her Wikipedia page lists her as an adviser to Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign.

In announcing her campaign for Senate, Long was quickly embraced as the favorite of powerful New York State Conservative Party Chair Mike Long (no relation). She is one of three candidates vying for the Republican ballot line this summer for the chance to run against Gillibrand later this year. And many observers believe that as a female candidate, she stands the best chance at unseating the still relatively unknown Gillibrand.

Ironically, Gillibrand herself is a Dartmouth alum. She graduated in 1988, two years before the quote by Hitler was published.

[UPDATE] The headline of the story was changed to reflect the fact that Long was not a founder of the Dartmouth Review, just a member of the inaugural staff. 

[UPDATE X2] A sentence in this article misattributing a quote about the education of women to Dinesh D’Souza was removed. The quotation was printed in a 1990 article by the New York Times, which was subsequently corrected to reflect the misattribution. We regret the error. 





Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trackback from your site.

  • Bruce Kogan

    A Conservative Party candidate for those rednecks to truly get behind.

  • Rachel Lavine

    I’m not usually one to defend conservatives, but the name here truly is a beard: these people are simply vicious bigots. True conservatives believe in the values of privacy and individualism. I was in college and participating in the South African divestment movement, and I remember the National Review staff quite well – they assaulted people, property and privacy and when caught, tried to hide behind the rules and regulations they usually derided.

  • Linda Alvarez

    Gillibrand herself is a Dartmouth alum–I have a question for her: Did she stand up against this rag while she was going to this hoity toity privileged school getting her conservative education? Let’s not forget Gillibrand was at one time (before she was kidnapped by the kook left) a Blue Dog Democrat.

  • Pingback: Dartmouth Weighs in on State Senate Contest Between Two Alums

  • Pingback: Morning Read: Bloomberg and Obama Meet; Dolan Disappointed; Savino’s Advice to Snooki | Politicker

  • sammylynn

    Can someone tell me the difference between being “a founder” and being “on the inaugural staff”??? Kinda sounds link the same thing…..

  • frankK

    No difference, just a pathetic attempt to avoid taking responsibilty for ones actions, words, or beliefs. Sammy what happened? are you still there???

  • SammyLynn

    I’m still here not sure what happened to my earlier comment/question?

    • YOUAREPATHETIC

      Making this pity lying story of yours not helping you. When you gets comments from people you knew, but honestly they don’t know you well, and never live with you from your teen to became man. It easy for you to kept acting like an innocent and the victim. I felt sorry for the man you are closed to you, because I honestly know you never tell him the WHOLE TRUTH. Well, you are not honest to yourself so I guess lie and hide some truth from them. I feel sorry for you. I think you deserved it.

  • SammyLynn

    Is this person seriously running for United States Senate? This is scary stuff.

  • GOP_NYC

    Its truly stunning how biased, slanted, and incorrect this article is. But what is one to expect of a “newspaper”(?) that gets most of its ad revenue from Liberal Democrat politicians commemorating ethnic and special interest holidays?

    FACT: The ugly magazine cover you show as “representative” of Wendy Long’s work on the Dartmouth Review was published in 2006, a quarter of a century after Long had graduated Dartmouth. (Conveniently, you can’t read the date of the edition on the City & State website.)

    FACT: Wendy Long graduated Dartmouth in 1982. The Dartmouth Review had been started only in 1980 as an alternative to the generally left-leaning “The Dartmouth”, the newspaper founded in 1799. And who edited that far older, more left-leaning newspaper? Wendy Long, as a college senior. (She also contributed to the Dartmouth Review.) As anyone who has served as an editor of ANY publication can assure you, YOUR paper comes first before anything you contribute to another.

    It would be interesting to see just how much journalistic integrity City & State has. Now that it has had to correct the piece TWICE, I wonder if the editors have sufficient integrity to (1) pull the cover that Ms. Long clearly had nothing to do with ; and (2) PROPERLY reflect Ms. Long’s work on BOTH newspapers, as an editor and as a contributor.

    Oh, wait…Fourth of July is coming up….LOTS of Democrat ad revenue “Wishing Constituents Well” from that, so, no, City & State won’t run a correction.