Hikind Appears To Have Voted For Fidler [UPDATED]

Written by Chris Bragg on . Posted in Blog, Campaigns/Elections.





The mystery of whom Assemblyman Dov Hikind voted for in the Brooklyn Senate special election may have been solved!

There were only two voters who cast absentee ballots in Hikind’s electoral district: Hikind, who was in Albany on the Mar. 20 special election day, and a man named Harry Weiss.

Vote tallies from that ED counted today show that one person voted for Councilman Lew Fidler, and one person voted for his Republican opponent for Senate, David Storobin. And reached by phone, Weiss confirmed that he had voted for Storobin — so we’re thinking that means that Hikind ended up voting for Fidler.

Hikind’s office didn’t return requests for comment, which I made yesterday in anticipation of the vote counting.

Hikind had been thought to initially be backing Fidler, but later publicly said he was not sure who he would support. He ultimately stayed neutral in the heated race, which currently has a 10 vote margin between Fidler and Storobin.

UPDATE:

Hmm. Hikind released a statement saying he voted for Storobin, calling this article “shenanigans.”

I’ll keep updating as things get clearer, but we now have two different people saying they voted for Storobin, when the absentee ballots say one person voted for Fidler, one for Storobin.

New York – As a response to the shenanigans of a few bloggers  speculating on who I voted for in the recent special election, I feel it’s important to set the record straight.

I like Lew Fidler. That’s why I did not endorse anyone. Lew is a decent guy who has helped the Jewish community. In light of the 60+ rabbonim who said it was prohibited to vote for him because of his stance on gay marriage—as well as the urging from my own rebbe, Rabbi Yisroel Belsky of Yeshivah Torah Vodaath urging people to support David Storobin—I had no choice but to vote my conscience and I voted for David Storobin.

I call upon the Board of Elections to make my absentee ballot public and set the record straight once and for all.





Tags: , ,

Trackback from your site.

  • 2 votes

    i hear Fidler is down 2 votes and most of the ballots left are in Fidler’s Council district.

  • http://MichaelBenjamin2012.wordpress.com/ Michael Benjamin

    That’s not fair. Freedom of the press should not sanction violating the privacy of the ballot. You handed Sarah Palin another arrow for her “gotcha” quiver and rant against the elite media.

    One right should not trump another. What if Fox News or NY Post “outed” a liberal journalist who voted by absentee ballot for McCain/Palin?

    The media should draw the line at protecting the privacy the ballot and the privacy of the minor children of elected officials.

  • Pingback: New York – Hikind Calls On Board Of Elections To Publicize His Ballot To Prove He Voted For David Storobin | Vosizneias but cleaner

  • Douglas Kellner

    It is a crime for any election official to reveal the name of any candidate for whom a voter has voted. Similiarly, it should be unethical for anyone else to make such a disclosure, even though it might be possible to learn how a voter voted from an examination of absentee ballots.

  • http://www.vjmachiavelli.blogspot.com VJ Machiavelli

    Are U sure only two ballots were cast ?

    Were any challenged ?

    If not someone is ………

    But reporters should not be calling up voters and asking who they voted for.

    Before there was the “Oracle of Delphi” there was Count Vampire J. Machiavelli

    VJ Machiavelli
    Power to the People who “VOTE”

  • Pingback: Roundup: Tweeting At The Man; 32BJ Wades In; Christie 2016 | Politicker