Rosa Parks And Redistricting In Williamsburg

Written by Alexis Grenell on . Posted in Opinion.





Alexis Grenell
(Illustration Credit: Lisanne Gagnon)

In New York City it would be unthinkable for a candidate to meet with an organization or club with an explicit “no blacks or Jews” policy. Yet candidates compete freely for a powerful voting bloc that blatantly discriminates against women: the Hasidic Jews of Williamsburg.

Last month at an event celebrating the Satmar sect’s founding rabbi’s rescue from Nazi captivity, City & State reported on an explicit “No girls allowed” policy. While male candidates for office were welcome to move freely throughout the event, women, including the only female candidate for mayor, were instructed to confine themselves to the balcony. Speaker Christine Quinn, perhaps having misplaced her binoculars, chose to send a male representative instead.

Tales of institutionalized sexism also made headlines last year when a bombshell report revealed gender-segregated seating on a Williamsburg bus line. Incidentally, the story ran just a few days before the sixth anniversary of Rosa Parks’ death.

Discrimination sanctioned by religion is no different from any other kind, except that it is protected by the First Amendment. The United States has always struggled to reconcile religious freedom with its democratic ideals, but the city’s decennial redistricting process is threatening to advantage one over the other.

This is a real problem for a city that claims to support women’s equality. Here’s why:

The New York City Districting Commission is supposed to adhere to an objective set of criteria to reflect demographic changes in the census, without regard to political data or voting information. However, the commission is clearly packing Hasidim into the 33rd Council District to advantage them politically.

The commission’s proposal for the 33rd Council District, which encompasses the heart of Hasidic Williamsburg, would annex a portion of the 35th Council District in Bedford-Stuyvesant to add 5,000 Hasidic votes. Currently the combined vote of the Satmar sects (Zalmanites and Aronites) is estimated to be about a third of the total universe of likely Democratic voters. In 2009, for example, the Zalmanites provided the current councilman, Steve Levin, with a crucial margin of victory in a seven-way primary. If the revised plan is approved, the Hasidim would further consolidate power to control as much as 50 percent of the likely primary vote.

To say that the ultra-Orthodox Hasidim are out of sync with the liberal leanings of the rest of the district, which includes Brooklyn Heights, DUMBO, Greenpoint and non-Hasidic Williamsburg, would be a gross understatement. As Judy Stanton, president of the Brooklyn Heights Association, testified at a recent public hearing, the voting patterns of the commission’s proposed 33rd District are such that it would be highly unlikely to elect a minority, gay or female representative. Or as Gary Schlesinger, an Aronite community member, testified: The commission would turn a “brownstone district into a Jewish ghetto.”

Although the commission and others claim that the proposed plan merely consolidates a natural community of interest, it is impossible to take them at their word. That ship sailed in November when the commission’s chairman admitted to considering the political needs of incumbent lawmakers. Of course, the revelation only became public after it was reported that the commission had made an 11th-hour accommodation for disgraced Assemblyman Vito Lopez, drawing his home into the 34th Council District to facilitate a potential run for the seat.

(Irony alert: the Hasidim—specifically the Zalmanites, the dominant sect—had no problem re-electing Lopez after he was censured for sexually harassing several female employees. Meanwhile, don’t even mention mixed-gender dancing.)

Obviously the process has been tainted. Or, as we say in Yiddish: Don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining.

The bottom line is that the commission’s proposal would leave an otherwise progressive district hostage to the whims of an extreme religious sect. This is surely not what the founders intended when they wrote redistricting into the Constitution. Nor is it consistent with the city’s reputation as the crown jewel of liberal democracy. What we do know is that if the Council approves the commission’s proposal, female voters in the non-Hasidic portion of the 33rd Council District will be sentenced to a decade of political inequality.

Welcome to New York City.

Alexis Grenell is a Democratic communications strategist based in New York. She handles nonprofit and political clients.





Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Moshe-Friedman/100002953600730 Moshe Friedman

    Shame on you for spreading xenophobia. Hasidim had no problem to vote for David Dinkins, Ed Towns, Cathyleen Rice among other minorities and women. Here is a response to your article http://www.r8ny.com/blog/gatemouth/the_intellectual_dishonesty_and_political_pimpwork_of_morgam_pehme_and_alexis_grenell.html

    • Jehovah’s Witness

      Moshe it’s 2013, not 1813. It’s not “xenophobic” to object to “separate but equal” behavior. I don’t care if you consider it “religious” . My God doesn’t discriminate. By the way, nobody cares what Gatemouth says. None of you can justify discrimination, which is what you all do in the name of “piety” when you’re anything but. God doesn’t like ugly.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Moshe-Friedman/100002953600730 Moshe Friedman

        We may behave how we want, and we still have a one-person-one-vote right. Second, the facts are totally wrong. We voted for women, black and lesbians. The article is a lie. So, cuz someone was prosecuted, we couldn’t vote anymore? A lot of Brooklyn Heights despise your religion, but this doesn’t strip you of your rights, BIGOT

        • Jehovah’s Witness

          Sexist bigoted sex abuse apologist. You’d strip women of their rights in a heartbeat if you could. Its 2013 dinosaur.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Moshe-Friedman/100002953600730 Moshe Friedman

            Love your language… Am glad that you attack me… Spew a little more. That’s entertaining

          • Jehovah’s Witness

            So Xenophobic, liar and bigot are ok for you to write but I am “attacking” you with my “language? Glad you’re entertained. It’ll keep you away from 14 year old “disobedient” girls. There is nothing decent or pious about your backward cult like behavior. This is America. Don’t impose your kookie beliefs on your neighbors. God doesn’t like that.

      • http://www.facebook.com/thomas.frangipani.5 Thomas Frangipani

        you need to lighten up, if you are really a witness, you wouldnt be so meanspirited and biased in your comments.

  • David S. Levine

    This is a prime example of feminazi rant! This is why so many Jews who once voted strictly Democ-rat no longer do so and this is a prime example of why because only manure like this rises to the heights of the Democ-rat Party. I’ll bet she would NEVER say or write the equivalent things about Moslems or Amish but she thinks that she can get away with writing this garbage about Jews. (If she wrote the same about Moslems Iran would pronounce a fatwa on her and she’d have to go into hiding as did another writer.) So Ms. Grenell, thanks for confirming my switch to the GOP and to paraphrase a popular comment, I’ll “never go back.”

    • Jehovah’s Witness

      Buddy, you kind of sound like you wish this was Iran. And guess what, big guy, your little cult’s behavior is VERY VERY SIMILAR to the Taliban. Hows your sex abuser counseling squad doing? Your little cult protected a man who sexually abused a little girl. Her crime? Thinking for herself. So blow it out your ear, you backward fool. God told me he doesn’t even like you.

  • Ana Maria

    Excellent article. Shame on anyone who hides behind the terms “xenophobia” and “feminazi” (really? How old are you?) to excuse good ole fashioned sexism. Discrimination is discrimination–period. Hiding behind religious beliefs so you can gerrymander a district, doesn’t make any less so.

    • Clear bias

      This author and the editor of this website have worked with Lincoln Restler and are writing this bogus article to bolster his campaign. Why no full disclosure? This highly unethical. Does the publisher know his website is being run this way?

  • rovingstorm

    My issue is with the article’s conclusion. While I am fiercely secular, and don’t have much in common politically with the Hasidim, their political power comes from their high voter turnout, not illegal behavior (as far as I know). If the rest of the district would do their civic duty and vote for all elections, big and small, this sect’s influence on the district would be muted.

  • Satmar Politics

    Irony Alert:
    Alexis Grennel, “A Democratic Strategist” isn’t even aware that Assemblyman Lopez does not represent Hasidic Williamsburg and the “Zalmanites” didn’t vote in the election where he was re-elected with 91% of the vote by his Hispanic/African American dominated costituents.

  • Satmar Politics

    Bottom line, the “Democratic Strategist” proposes breaking up the Williamsburg Hasidic community into separate districts because their religious practices does not meet her approval.
    Garry Shlesinger conveniently agrees with her for a different reason, because he can’t face the fact that the “aronite” community is a minority in Williamsburg.
    What a marriage of convenience………….

  • Clear bias

    Is this going to be reported as an in kind contribution to Lincoln Restler’s campaign? I heard the author was actually involved in Restler’s push poll. Why not report about that?

  • http://www.facebook.com/thomas.frangipani.5 Thomas Frangipani

    Although the author is correct in her assertions about the hasidics being outdated and old fashioned, they are doing what any other special interest minority group in this city does, vie for political power. The voting rights act of 1965 does it for minoirites, particularly blacks, by gerrymandering voters by race, even though it is probally not needed anymore since its 2013 and blacks have proven they can get elected in white majority districts. Im not aware of her shilling for Lincoln Restler, but forums like this are known to have planted articles that aid their surrogates.

  • Greenpoint Residents