Winners and Losers, June 29, 2012

Written by City & State on . Posted in Winners & Losers.





 

The unusually early June congressional primary came and went this week, as voters selected the candidates who can start hunting for real estate in Washington, D.C., others who will have big-time showdowns in the general election this fall, and still others sent back to languish in Albany, the City Council or places even less politically significant. As always, each race came to a close with plenty who benefitted and plenty who came up short, including this week’s winners and losers.

Chris Collins – When he was voted out of the Erie County executive’s office last fall, some wondered why the Republican Party seemed to be imploding in Western New York – and not a few figured the electoral loss was the death knell for Collins’ political career. Whether he’s fully resurrected himself or he’s just a political zombie who’ll be killed off by the end of this political thriller, Collins is looking alive again with his Republican primary win over David Bellavia and chance to knock off Democratic Congresswoman Kathy Hochul in a solidly Republican district this fall.

Joseph Crowley – After last year’s special election between Bob Turner and David Weprin, we and others pegged Queens Democratic chairman Joe Crowley as the biggest loser of the day after Weprin’s stunning defeat. So it’s only fair that following Tuesday’s congressional primary, we acknowledge that Crowley won huge by selecting Assemblywoman Grace Meng as the party’s pick in the NY-6 race. Some close to Crowley urged him to pick someone potentially safer – such as Councilman Mark Weprin – but Crowley made history by selecting someone who could be the first Asian-American from New York elected to Congress. Now, if Meng can get through a tough general election against Republican Dan Halloran, we have a feeling Joe will be throwing some sort of epic karaoke party in the near future.

Mike Long – The longtime chairman of the state Conservative Party has suffered some defeats and been second-guessed even by members of his own party in recent years, but this week he was vindicated for backing of a little-known lawyer, Wendy Long, in the Republican U.S. Senate primary. Though Rep. Bob Turner had become the darling of conservatives after his upset win in a special election last year, Long went with Long (no relation), who won remarkably easily. The Long & Long show won’t have it so easy taking on Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand this fall, but there’s at least plenty of time to prepare for the battle.

Charlie Rangel – No amount of drama or trauma has ever been able to take down Charlie Rangel – and it appears that nothing ever will. Whether it be redistricting, sickness or ethical clouds, Rangel has trucked on, defiantly telling everyone in earshot that he’s the only man for his job. Although there’s some question as to whether outstanding ballots could tighten his race with state Sen. Adriano Espaillat, we have a feeling that Rangel will make it through that trial unscathed too.

Peter Ward – Earlier this week, Assemblywoman Grace Meng told us that getting the backing of the Hotel Trades Council was the key to turning around a once-struggling campaign. In fact, after every election people seem to say something similar about the Ward-led operation, from Tom DiNapoli to Michael Bloomberg. But just in case everyone might forget, Meng again praised the HTC’s backing as a major key to her victory during her election night speech. And to top it all off, an HTC-led hotel boycott upstate even began to gain a bit of steam this week, with the Trial Lawyers Association canceling plans to hold their annual convention at the Desmond Hotel.

 

 

Charles Barron – All of the sound and fury ended up signifying nothing. If the worst part about the controversial councilman’s election night results had simply been the fact that he lost by 40+ points, he might still have escaped this week’s hall of shame, since, to be fair, Barron was the longest of long shots and Jeffries probably outspent him by more than 10-1. But what really was cause for humiliation was the striking revelation that Barron had no base of support, well, anywhere. Not only did he lose every single Assembly district, including the one represented by his wife, Inez, Barron even lost his own block, getting edged out in his election district 57 to 50. Wow, that hurts.

Ed Cox – When the New York State GOP chair recruited Bob Turner to run for U.S. Senate, he figured the congressman had a better chance of beating Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand than any of the no-name Republican candidates who were already looking to run. But even though Turner was already elected to national office, he couldn’t translate that into a victory in the Republican primary. During the campaign, Cox even got tangled in the fight when he backed Turner’s push to name a wildlife refuge after former Conservative Sen. James Buckley – which political newcomer and eventual winner Wendy Long pegged as a thinly veiled attempt to boost Turner’s campaign.

Rory Lancman – Sometimes it’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you play the game. Well, in this case, it was both the result of his race and the way that he ran it that makes Lancman one of this week’s losers. Not only did Grace Meng gore Lancman by over 20 points, she earned plaudits for her likeability while Lancman came off as, to quote a WNYC report, “self-serving,” “focused on his own self-promotion,” and lacking in “introspection.” One of Lancman’s colleagues even called him “the most hated member of the state Assembly.” On the bright side, come November that characterization won’t be true anymore—because since Rory didn’t run for re-election, he’s out of his job too.

Vito Lopez – The powerful Brooklyn Democratic Party chairman can rest knowing that he punched out an old rival, Rep. Ed Towns, and helped pave the way for Hakeem Jeffries’s victory, but he badly miscalculated challenging Rep. Nydia Velazquez, who trounced Councilman Erik Dilan by a nearly two-to-one margin. Two years is an eternity in politics, but Dilan may be questioning another run in 2014 based on those results. And Velazquez’s progressive allies are smelling blood. Now they’re going after Dilan’s father, state Sen. Martin Dilan, in September, which could force Lopez to spend more resources on what he likely considered a safe seat. But as Shakespeare wrote in King Lear, “Come not between the dragon and his wrath.”

Rabbi David Niederman – The most influential rabbi inWilliamsburg’s Hasidic community tried everything to get his Satmar faction to put Erik Dilan in Congress. He urged residents to vote in columns in Der Yid, the neighborhood’s largest Yiddish language newspaper, sent hundreds of Orthodox Jews to staff the polls during primary day, and even helped convince yeshivas to extend their school year. But he was unable to pull enough votes for Dilan among the Satmar Zalmanite community to counteract Velazquez’s support throughout the congressional district. Niederman remains the top political maven in the Zalmanite community, but politicians who visit South Williamsburg now must also meet with his bitter rivals, the Aronites, whose power continues to grow with each election cycle.





Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Trackback from your site.

  • David S. Levine

    I HATE to say it but it’s a tribute to the wisdom of the Democ-rat primary voters of the Jeffries CD that Barron was so badly defeated! The only chance Barron had was that the electorate was limited to enrolled Democ-rats and even they actually rose to the occassion–a rare thing indeed.
    As to the other (good time) Charlie, the voters of that district acted like Democ-rats usually act–they don’t care what their legislator does as long as the goodies keep coming. Gimmie, Gimmie, Gimmie–that’s the mantra of the Democ-rat Party, a coalition of scum, slime, filth, vermin and manure!
    I voted for Chris Collins in the “winners” contest–he will defeat the liar who was elected in a fluke election against an inarticulate candidate.

  • Tom Murphy

    Tell us what you really feel David!

    Real losers of the week: Lillian Roberts, now revealed as a person-in-need-of-supervision. (“Susan Kent on line #1; Lee Saunders on line #2, Ms. Roberts”)

    And, of course, Grover Norquist, who forgot to get No Tax pledges from Republican SCOTUS candidates! Now that’s bad planning.

  • http://MichaelBenjamin2012.wordpress.com/ Michael A. Benjamin

    The facts surrounding the rout of CM Barron begs the question, “why were Democratic leaders so worried?” They surely knew from his previous non-City Council races his difficulty getting votes beyond city council role. Jimmy McMillan outpolled him in the gubernatorial primary. Are they going to freak out when he announces for Borough President?

    I think it’s funny that an ex-Black Panther got “mau-maued” by his foils. Tom Wolfe must be enjoying the delicious irony.

  • YOELY from wiiilamsburg

    David neiderman: Let me say you one paragraph in yiddish, משה דוד: כאשר החילות לנפול נפל תפל לפניו

    • David

      Yoely great comment.

  • DaveIsNuts

    DAVID NIEDERMAN SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!!! FOR USING THE JEWISH COMMUNITY IN WILLIAMSBURG FOR YOUR DIRTY POLITICS! Now is the beginning from the end of your political power.

    • rabbi indik

      I feel your pain the aronis tried there best and thay took out there maximum votes and thay voted on other peoples names like they always do in KJ, and thay couldn’t geth more then 33 % of the williamsburg jewish votes

  • moses

    David Neiderman the chance to keep on ignore people in community is over, now all politician to see it clear that they can’t ignore those aronite block vote of 4479 & it will grow much more!

  • יואלי 2

    די אפגעריסענע נידערמאן די נידעריגע מאן וואס די ביסט יעדע רשע באקומט זיין סוף יעצט הייבט זיך עס אן “געדענק” תשובה העלפט אייביג

  • rabbi mentzer

    Rabbi neidrman of ujo uses tx money to fight the satmar older brothers community he uses a none for profit org to fight people in the coummnuity who are not with him 100 % he is a thief

  • asken in williamsburg

    David niederman, this is what ends up with a personn, that calls himself representing the community, but in truth, represents certain individuals, for favors iin return. Your time is up, throw in the towel, and let the real community activist take charge.

  • GERSHY SCHLASINGER

    The aronis only power they have is in the media, with nice articles in all blogs to explain why they r winners, whan in fact in the areas in willamsburg with most jewish population rabbi nidermans candidate got 67 % or more!!!!!!

  • willamsburg resident

    the older brother aron, to his younger brother rabbi zalmen!! The only thing what’s bed with rabbi niderman and why they stared fighting him is because he is a follower from rabbi zalmen and that’s why thay are keeping on terrorizing him the last 12 years!! Even thay also know when they need a real favor rabbi niderman is the first address.

  • willamsburg resident

    If someone reads the comments here against the well known good hearted rabbi niderman u can star understand why 70 % or more satmar community in wiilamsburg left the older brother aron, to his younger brother rabbi zalmen!! The only thing what’s bed with rabbi niderman and why they stared fighting him is because he is a follower from rabbi zalmen and that’s why thay are keeping on terrorizing him the last 12 years!! Even thay also know when they need a real favor rabbi niderman is the first address.

  • CH Observer

    There is a noticeable groundswell of support for the aronites, presumably they were deflated in previous elections due to their poor showing which kept feeding the same negative energy for the next election, to their credit, they have managed to break free of that cycle and are now bound to have an even stronger showing in the upcoming next votes.

  • yanki stein

    To all the posts here to say neiderman is a winner can go on a difrenet news site because theyy say d nedierman is a losser they didn’t say rabbi indig is or rabbi schlesinger is so if you don’t like it its a free country take the monsey bus and stay there

  • די פארטרעטער פון וומסב״ג

    משה דוד נידערמאן כא כא כא כא כא
    לאכן לאכט די לעצטער

  • Gerry schlesinger

    I don’t get it how someone who delivered 67% votes in his area for his candidate, and doubled his block vote from 3500 to over 7000 is called a loser

    In my eyes as a regular Williamsburg residents Rabbi David Niederman was the winner of the week

  • zalmen leib feldman

    hi the points here has to be about a person him self so i will talk about neiderman here he is a nioce guy to his family he works and is a good father and also a grand father but as a community leader he is a Fallon tiger because he took him slef one aganda to fight rabbi aron tetielbaum and what happned you can read here and he will go down more and more

  • mosfi

    FRIDAY, JUNE 29, 2012
    123 at 1:37 PM
    Yossi: I Have the Numbers
    It is
    over 60 hours since I asked Yossi Gestetner for his
    numbers on the growing
    Aranite power, but he is still
    mum and vague on the issue. Instead the
    Aranites put out
    a misleading press release, with clearly fabricate results
    .
    So, I will put out the numbers that I have received from
    the Board of
    Elections, showing that the Zalanite power
    haven’t changed much in the
    current election cycle.
    Below are the Board of Election results of
    Assembly
    district 50 – where the overwhelming majority of the
    Williamsburg
    Hasidim vote – printed out in the morning
    after the elections.
    The
    Aranites claim that the Zalanites had a slim 47/43
    margin (no explanation
    where the other 10 percent
    went…). Fact of the matter is that the Dilan won
    this
    district even stronger than his own, receiving 5,252 votes,
    57.14
    percent; against Velasquez’s 3,854 votes, or 41.93
    percent.
    It’s important
    to note that the district is not Super-Jewish,
    and Velazquez ran very strong
    in the rest of the district
    and even won in the neighboring 53rd Assembly
    District,
    represented by Lopez. Velazquez was definitely much
    stronger
    with the non-Jewish voters, thus the Satmars
    broke for Dilan much stronger
    than the 57.14 that he won
    in the district as a whole.
    Steve Levin’s
    primary is often a reference point to the
    Satmar’s strength in the
    neighborhood. Mr. Levin, backed
    by the Zalanites, won 52.65 percent of the
    district’s vote -
    3,879 votes; and Issac Abraham, who ran with support
    of
    the Aranites, pulled in 24.8 percent, or 1,830 votes. There
    were a
    couple of other strong candidates. Abraham
    received 92.87 percent of his
    total votes from the district,
    which shows that his votes were almost
    exclusively
    Hasidic, while Levin only received 72.58 percent of his
    total
    vote from Williamsburg, meaning that he had a lot of
    support in the
    non-Jewish community as well. That means
    that a larger part of his vote have
    to be credited to the
    non-Jewish versus Abraham’s, while currently
    Velazquez
    fared much better with the non-Jewish.
    To really assess the
    gains and losses of each side, will
    require breaking down the EDs, which is
    too time
    consuming and complicated. Also, I don’t have the
    Levin
    breakdowns by EDs. But talking of a significant gain for
    the
    aranites and a 47/43 split, is laughable and show how
    trust-worthy they are.
    It’s clear that the Zalanites did
    considerably better than the some 57
    percent that Dilan
    won in the whole district, and it’s quite possible that
    they
    even gained percentage-wise on the Levin votes.
    Note: I’m told, and
    it looks like, that the Velazquez
    number in ED 47, where it shows 500, is a
    mistake, and
    added a zero to her total. My analysis took the report as
    is,
    but if this mistake is true, that would lower Velazquez’
    percentage to 38.9
    percent, versus 60 percent for Dilan,
    meaning that the zalanites definitely
    gained on previous
    elections, given her strength in the districts outside
    the
    Jewish community.
    And with over 5,000 votes brought out in an
    off-primary
    for a non-exciting candidate, I don’t know of any other
    Jewish
    group that vote as strong and in-mass as the
    Williamsburg zalanites. They are
    a real voting
    powerhouse, but they have to catch up on the PR side..

  • mosfi

    Response to Yossi Geshtetner’s bogus analysis.

    Wed, Jun 27, 2012 12:47 PM

    Without disparaging Yossi Gestetner personally, it must be noted that as
    a paid consultant for Aroinim he is still doing a poor job.
    Spinning with
    facts that are not possible to backup will most surely backfire and destroy
    whatever credibility he might still have.

    Can he name that “one voting
    location of younger Hasidic voters, the split is 49-51″. There is
    none.

    In fact the most pure voting location in Williamsburg is the IS171
    on Heyward Street, it covers approximately the Williamsburg area north of the
    BQE to Heyward Street, an area populated 99% with only hasidic
    families.

    It also happens to be the largest Williamsburg voting site with
    a total vote turnout of over 2,600 votes. The breakdown was 1,672 for Dilan
    versus 947 for Velasquaz.

    Each and every voting site in Hasidic
    Williamsburg had at least 61% for Dilan. When the numbers are analyzed it shows
    that the voting sites south of the BQE where there are more elderly Jewish
    families the Dilan numbers dropped off a bit (Still above 61%) and that’s
    because of the succesful Absentee drive by the Zalman (Dilan) people of the
    elderly population, there are approximately 700 absentee ballots to be read and 90% will be for
    Dilan.

    Its true that chaos reigned in Hasidic Williamsburg. People who
    registered recently were not on the voter books, peoples names were missing from
    the books en masse, 100′s of people left the voting sites instead of spending
    the time to do affidavit ballots after standing inline for 90 minutes or
    longer.

    Its also true that the Aroinim had a very sophisiticated and
    intimidating presence at the voting sites. They had youngsters with blackberrys
    acting as poll watchers, emailing each name as a person obtained their ballot
    and they had a very targeted GOTV operation, knew everyone that voted and got
    the remainders out.

    This operation probably gave them an extra 3-4 points
    by succesfully pulling their people to the polls with way greater accuracy than
    the Zalmen operation who didn’t do a targeted GOTV, but in the end it was still
    very close to 2-1 for Dilan against Velasquez and these numbers won’t change
    anytime soon.

    If someone will take the time and analyze the election
    results for Williamsburg over the past 12 years since the break up of Satmar,
    beginning with the very first race of Fisher/Markowitz for Boro President in
    2001, the consistency of 65/35 split is a constant with very little
    varaiation.

    Turnout skyrocketed but the percentage split is a
    constant.

    Yossies analysis is bogus and can’t be supported by facts, its
    just wishful thinking.

  • Former ODA Employee

    Neiderman is the biggest looser, also the ODA , Kestenbaum clan. The ODA gets over $60 Million a year in various goverment fundings and over 30% of that ends up in the pockets of Louis & Moses Kestenbaum who took over the ODA since their father is senile. All the inlaws and friends of the Kestenbaums get fat paychecks for No Show jobs, Kickbacks is the only way to benifit of any funding via the ODA

  • shaya rubin

    Wow i will show at your first point that you are a lier so u i wont evan answer all your lies polling site 855 kent ave had 49 to 51 so go tell lies in rodney but not here where u can see facts

  • pollak

    The zlais are not under the bus in the poltical world but they are on the way answer me did the aronim ever had such positive mdia about there presntes in williamsburg the anser is no so this means that the zalis are on the way down thats the whole point of this election turn out if the aronim are on top no not yet but they are higher the june 25 and are the zalis at the bottom no but not so high as june 25. And you know it that the aronim will just get more voters and more till you will scream all day aron foy like u did all day hahahahahaha

  • ערנסט גערעדט

    ענק מאכען א חילול השם עס איז נישט קיין קינדער שפיל
    נישט יעדער דארף אלעס מיטהאלטען וד”ל

  • josh

    Lopez is the looser, big time!