New York City

Why Industry City rezoning is failing

Neighborhood activists convinced City Councilman Carlos Menchaca to oppose plans for the Brooklyn building complex.

An abandoned building along the 39th Street Pier in the Sunset Park neighborhood of Brooklyn.

An abandoned building along the 39th Street Pier in the Sunset Park neighborhood of Brooklyn. Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock

Last week, New York City Council Member Carlos Menchaca, who represents Brooklyn’s Sunset Park neighborhood, announced he would officially oppose the rezoning application submitted by the owners of Industry City – a sprawling, 35-acre complex that once housed heavy manufacturing, but now includes retail, offices, storage and restaurants. Owners Jamestown, Angelo Gordon and Belvedere Capital sought to modify use, bulk, parking and public access requirements, in orderto add more than 1 million square feet of new development, including luxury hotels, a high school, office space, and large retail.

Since the City Council usually defers to members from affected areas on rezoning, that means the current proposal now has little chance of passing. Although the owners have yet to officially withdraw the application, The Real Deal labeled it “effectively dead.”

The outcome is the culmination of more than a decade of community organizing and lobbying by grassroots groups advocating for environmental justice and against gentrification. Chief among them are Uprose and Protect Sunset Park, which organized rallies, distributed petitions, coordinated community strikes, pressured Industry City executives directly, and hosted workshops and information sessions.

Neighborhood activists are celebrating their victory. Others, including developers and some City Council members, lament the shift, which they say could cost New York City tens of thousands of jobs at a moment of acute economic precarity. The city’s unemployment rate is hovering at 20 percent and projections suggest one-third of its 240,000 small businesses may never reopen.

Industry City’s rezoning proposal, made public in 2015, was controversial from the start. The space, historically known as Bush Terminal, is a collection of warehouses, factories, and piers built in the early 1900s that moved between private and public ownership during the first half of the 20th century. Although Manhattan – the Garment District in Midtown, Chinatown and the Lower East Side – had long served as hubs for garment production, garment workers began moving to Sunset Park in the early 1990s, drawn by cheaper rents. Until around 2012, the neighborhood remained one of New York City’s primary clothing manufacturing sectors, second only to the Midtown Garment Center.

Today, the publicly operated space known as “Bush Terminal” still occupies around 71 acres of space, from 40th to 51st streets – in 2018, the New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC) announced a $136 million investment to transform it into a film and television production campus. Industry City refers to the privately owned commercial complex situated to the north, between 32nd and 41st streets.

The EDC is working to improve the area, situated between the harbor and the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway – a particularly undesirable part of Sunset Park – with $38 million in repairs and improvement to the streets between the waterfront and the expressway, spanning from 37th to 43rd.

Sunset Park, historically a blue-collar neighborhood home to Polish and Norwegian immigrants, drew new arrivals from Puerto Rico after World War II, and subsequent waves from South and Central America, primarily from Mexico and the Dominican Republic. In the last few decades, the neighborhood area has seen significant Chinese immigration; today, the eastern segment of Sunset Park is Brooklyn’s largest Chinatown.

Despite being next to the highway and a hodgepodge of undistinguished low-slung buildings, Industry City boasts the spacious industrial-chic architecture that has become home to luxury lofts and creative industry working spaces in neighborhoods such as SoHo and Dumbo. While brownstones on Sunset Park’s leafier streets just a block uphill already cost more than $1 million, the area’s modest brick and clapboard row houses and relatively reasonably priced apartments are a working-class refuge near the increasingly unaffordable Brooklyn waterfront.

In recent years, the neighborhood began drawing young professionals increasingly priced out of neighborhoods like Park Slope, Sunset Park’s neighbor to the north. Rent prices have been steadily rising; in 2018, one-third of Sunset Park households were “rent-burdened,” meaning they spend more than half of their income on rent. Although the commercial corridors of 4th and 5th Avenues are dominated by unpretentious Latino-owned bodegas and restaurants, new types of businesses have trickled in – and many are concentrated in Industry City. Trendy offerings – from a fast-casual spot specializing in $11 avocado toast to a “ginger liqueur tasting room” – have some residents worried the area could undergo the same transformation as nearby neighborhoods such as Park Slope, Gowanus and Red Hook that have seen rapid gentrification upend formerly working-class enclaves with once-sizeable Latino populations. And they’ve eyed Industry City’s planned expansion as an indication that even the neighborhood’s cheapest blocks might soon be out of reach.

Industry City’s current owners bought stakes in the complex in 2013 and hired CEO Andrew Kimball, who had overseen the Brooklyn Navy Yard’s evolution for the previous eight years. They began renovations and leasing, attempting to draw a range of businesses, “from food manufacturing to clothing to technology to media, that all want to come together and be near each other, where their creativity feeds off of one another in this kind of space,” a Jamestown executive said at the time.

In the last few years, some progressive activists began to worry that this new version of Industry City, the largest privately owned industrial property in New York, is driving up housing costs and increases displacement. In a particularly poignant example of an increasingly hostile dynamic, neighborhood activists demonstrated outside a $75 wine-tasting in 2016, saying the high-end event reflected a “vision to turn Sunset Park into the next SoHo, the next Chelsea.”

In March 2019, the complex’s owners planned to submit an application to the Department of City Planning, outlining a 10-year, $1 billion project that would expand the facilities’ square footage from 5.3 to 6.6 million, build hotels, new retail space, and academic centers, creating an estimated 15,000 on-site jobs. At the time, Kimball said the proposal would “fully reactivate the long-dormant, non-productive buildings of Industry City into a job-intensive hub for manufacturers, innovators and entrepreneurs, while also maximizing economic opportunity for area residents and local businesses.”

Menchaca urged the owners to hold off, largely in response to opposition from local groups, and conditioned his backing on a set of demands, including removing hotels from the application, entering a community benefits agreement with local groups, and receiving investments from City Hall, notably to preserve affordable housing. (The mayor’s office rejected the request, claiming the city shouldn’t intervene in a private dispute, comments Mayor Bill de Blasio reiterated earlier this week). Industry City’s owners agreed to make the changes, but proceeded to initiate the seven-month public land-review process in October against Menchaca’s wishes – and without altering the text of the application.

In mid-March, the pandemic put the land-review process on hold. But just as it was set to restart this month, Politico reported that Industry City was reconsidering the rezoning application altogether. The next day, Menchaca announced that he had mind up his mind: He would vote no on the rezoning, and called on Industry City’s owners to pull the proposal.

“My decision around Industry City – like every land use decision – comes down to accountability,” Menchaca said by email. “When (a) private developer say(s) they will create 20,000 jobs, it doesn't mean they will. We must always ask the follow up: for who?”

The activists who had been pressuring Menchaca are taking a victory lap. “Menchaca did the right thing in pledging to vote no – particularly in the face of the larger conversation we’re having about equity and justice and COVID’s impact on communities of color,” said Elizabeth Yeampierre, the president of Uprose, a community-based organization that advocates for racial justice and sustainable development. “This application was never something that was going to benefit this community and it’s not forward-thinking.”

Uprose, founded in 1966, is Brooklyn’s oldest Latino community-based organization, and pursues community engagement on issues related to the environment, housing costs and government accountability.

Even before developers set their sights on Sunset Park, Yeampierre – a former civil rights lawyer who served as a dean at Yale – was working to revive the area. She wanted to keep rents affordable and foster a diverse and livable neighborhood, advocating for a waterfront park and working with businesses to improve sustainability practices.

When Industry City arrived, “people in the community came to us and expressed concern about the waterfront,” she recalled. “They asked us for alternatives. If not this, then what?” She feared its development goals would derail her vision and replace it with “a commercial, artisanal-bread vision that’s been implemented in Dumbo, Williamsburg, Chelsea and everywhere else in New York City.” 

Most of all, Yeampierre was concerned that Industry City’s expansion would only exacerbate trends that have been underway in Sunset Park for the past two decades – a rise in housing costs that has pushed out many of the neighborhoods primarily Latino and Chinese immigrants. “The industrial waterfront wasn’t supposed to be a beacon for the most privileged in the city.”

In 2019, Uprose released its own proposal for a “Green Resilient Industrial District,” or GRID, that aims to retain the waterfront’s maritime and industrial character, creating opportunities for jobs in renewable energy production, sustainable business, and recycling and waste management. The plan would also incorporate green infrastructure to reduce flooding, such as installing rain gardens, wetlands, porous surfaces, and bioswales, which decrease stormwater runoff and remove debris and pollution. Yeampierre said the initiative would not only help improve the area’s resilience to climate-related events – it experienced significant damage during Superstorm Sandy in 2012 – but would provide higher wages than the retail and office jobs created by Industry City.

Critics of Uprose question that proposal’s economic feasibility: New York City doesn’t have solar panel factories because heavy manufacturing has relocated to places with cheaper land and labor – not because people haven’t said it would be nice to have them. By contrast, while service jobs at artisanal bakeries might pay less, they’re comparable to the service jobs many Sunset Park residents hold and are better than no jobs at all. But Uprose argues their plan is consistent with the EDC’s stated interest in supporting green industry on the publicly owned segments of the Sunset Park waterfront. In privately owned Industry City, making GRID possible could entail changing current zoning to limit further development of retail and office space. As of now, there are no immediate plans for implementation, but if the rezoning is ultimately rejected, Uprose plans to present GRID as an alternative before the City Planning Commission and City Council.

Activists say last week’s developments were a long time coming. “Industry City’s plan had been falling apart for a while,” said Jorge Muñiz, an activist affiliated with Protect Sunset Park, a neighborhood coalition. Muñiz, an organizer and strategist, started approaching locals on the streets back in March 2019, when Industry City first submitted its rezoning application. “A lot of people didn’t understand,” he recalled. “They said, ‘if it’s private property, why does our opinion matter?’ And we explained that it’s not just about the buildings, it’s about the land, and that involves you.” Soon, the coalition had a 4,000-signature petition against the rezoning plan, which they delivered directly to Menchaca’s office. “We encouraged people to show up at community meetings, to voice their opinions. It was clear that Menchaca was moving toward a deal with Industry City, and we worked to unify people against that,” he said.“After years of community pushback, Menchaca finally decided to stand with the community.”

Industry City has not confirmed it will withdraw its application, and is “considering all options,” spokesperson Vanessa Figueroa said by email. Still, she attributed the heightened reservations in part to the “the cost of appeasing even the most unreasonable requests” for modifying the application.

Backers of Industry City’s expansion call Menchaca’s decision shortsighted. In an op-ed in the New York Daily News, Councilmembers Ritchie Torres and Donovan Richards called the rezoning project a “historic” opportunity to create jobs and build tax revenue.“The social safety net, needed now more than ever for hundreds of thousands if not millions of needy New Yorkers, does not pay for itself,” they write. “It requires growth and, yes, wealth. We can squander $100 million a year in tax revenue or reinvest those dollars in public housing and public schools and public transit. We can create 20,000 jobs or destroy them.”

Randy Peers, the president and CEO of the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce, who previously served as chair of Community Board 7, which includes Sunset Park, echoed that sentiment. Now more than ever, he stressed, Sunset Park could benefit from what Industry City can offer: “jobs and opportunity, preserving industrial and manufacturing space, and investing in a community that can clearly benefit. When you consider all that, for us to just walk away and throw in the towel is unconscionable,” he told City & State.

Peers argued that Industry City has long focused on community engagement, notably through its Innovation Lab, which offers education, training, and job placement, “with the goal of connecting the local community to new opportunities.” He called Menchaca’s announcement “completely unexpected,” noting that “the community benefits task force was still in the process of meeting.”

But according to Menchaca, Industry City’s premature initiation of the land review process undermined local groups’ bargaining power from the get-go, even within the context of the task force. “Industry City did not give the community the time it needed to negotiate effectively,” he said, particularly given the asymmetry between a “private developer backed by global, multi-billion dollar investors” and a coalition of community volunteers, which “needs time to find proper legal counsel and other facilitators to make the negotiation fair.” Industry City created “immense pressure to negotiate something, even if flawed, which is the antithesis of accountability and respect,” he said.

Activists like Yeampierre and Muñiz also question the basis of Industry City’s pledge to create 20,000 jobs. They say that, even if it was accurate, those aren’t jobs the community needs. “Even if locals can take those entry-level jobs, they won’t be able to afford to live in the community,” Yeampierre said. Between May 2018 and May 2019, Industry City’s Innovation Lab had placed 114 people in jobs, one-third of whom were from Sunset Park, with an average salary of around $17 per hour. “They say they’ll create office jobs, but when 40 percent of Sunset Park residents don’t have a high school diploma, well-paid office-sector jobs would be completely inaccessible.”

For Menchaca, Industry City’s capacity to reshape the neighborhood is clear. “Industry City has made an impossible pitch, claiming they will somehow restore the waterfront’s manufacturing by building a luxury retail mall,” he said by email, attracting “affluent New Yorkers and tourists” who, in turn, “will drive up rents.”

With Industry City’s fate uncertain, what’s clear is that Sunset Park, reeling from the economic impact of Covid-19, is in need of jobs. “It will require politicians to go beyond flashy headlines of ‘20,000 new jobs,’ and think about accessible jobs that create real opportunities for immigrant workers that can grow,” said Muñiz. “Industry City acts as if they’re the only ones who can create employment. But people in the community have big ideas.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.