Politics

Examining Hector LaSalle’s complex judicial legacy

On the eve of his state Senate hearing, additional cases shed light on his philosophy.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York building in Manhattan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York building in Manhattan Sergi Reboredo/VW Pics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

For the past month, supporters of state Court of Appeals Chief Judge nominee Hector LaSalle have fought the growing opposition to his nomination. They have called criticisms of him “mischaracterizations” based on a few cases that have been used to paint LaSalle as anti-union and anti-abortion rights. While only a handful of cases have received the bulk of attention since his nomination, opponents have highlighted an array of opinions that LaSalle joined during his decade in the Appellate Division that they believe illustrates a conservative track record that makes him a bad fit to lead New York’s highest court. 

LaSalle’s decision to join opinions in two particular cases – Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Communications Workers of America District 1 and Evergreen Association Inc. v. Schneiderman – have made up the core of the arguments for LaSalle’s alleged anti-labor and anti-abortion rights beliefs. In the Cablevision case, he joined a unanimous decision among the appellate panel of judges to allow a lawsuit from Cablevision against individual union members to advance. In the Evergreen case, he joined a majority decision limiting the subpoena power of the state attorney general in relation to an investigation into a crisis pregnancy center. Opponents and supporters have argued the merits of those decisions, with supporters making the case that they were simply procedural and opponents saying they were evidence of a clear conservative bias.

As supporters have said that LaSalle can’t be judged on two cases, opponents have begun to unearth other decisions that should warrant scrutiny. One such case was People v. Bridgeforth, in which LaSalle joined a decision that said dismissing jurors based on skin color passed constitutional muster. “The opinion Justice LaSalle joined in Bridgeforth ignores the obvious discrimination in the prosecution’s actions,” attorneys Vincent Southerland and Jason Williamson recently wrote in a Queens Daily Eagle op-ed. The decision found that while the prosecutor dismissed the jurors based on skin color, skin color is not a protected class and therefore the dismissals were allowed. “It was an opinion that quite literally did not see color,” Southerland and Williamson wrote.

The case made its way to the state Court of Appeals, where the judges unanimously ruled to overturn the appellate decision. In its opinion, the judges agreed with the argument that upholding the decision would have “eviscerated” the protections afforded under a different landmark ruling known as Batson, which decided that striking jurors on the basis of race was unconstitutional. “Had Justice LaSalle’s rejection of skin color as a protected class prevailed, it would have had the perverse effect of inviting the very sort of discrimination that Batson is supposed to prevent,” Southerland and Williamson wrote.

Another key decision was Campanelli v. Long Island Lighting Co. In the case, a child with birth defects sued the company his father worked for, arguing that the lead dust he brought home from work resulted in the development of disabilities through exposure in utero and during infancy. LaSalle joined an opinion that found the company only had a duty of care for the employee, not for his children. “What's interesting about that decision is that there is no statutory law on the books that requires it,” Noah Rosenblum, an assistant law professor at the New York University School of Law, told City & State. “The Legislature never passed a law that said the duty of care in New York only extends this far.” Rosenblum said that a previous appellate decision the opinion referenced explicitly said it should not set precedent, instead setting up a situation where individual judges should weigh the merits of the cases in deciding the ultimate liability rather than rely on precedent. “He totally could have said that the duty of care did extend – he just chose not,” Rosenblum argued as further evidence of LaSalle’s conservative jurisprudence.

Interestingly, LaSalle technically has a record with the Court of Appeals already, having vouched on two cases in which another judge recused themselves. One of those cases was very high profile, and he joined former Chief Judge Janet DiFiore and what some court observers considered a conservative bloc in a narrow majority. On the second case he joined, there was a much wider majority and only one of the seven judges dissented. Several other decisions on which he joined an opinion similarly received support from the court’s conservative bloc of judges while the more progressive judges generally dissented.

LaSalle’s defenders have continued to say that the totality of the 5,000 cases on which he has joined opinions paint a very different picture than the one his opponents have presented. “I was labeled one of the most liberal judges and certainly was maybe the most liberal chief judge in recent memory, and I know Hector LaSalle shares the views I have about everybody getting their day in court,” former Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman told City & State. He wouldn’t opine on specific cases when asked about them without first reading the decisions and other details, but said he has confidence that LaSalle’s record is not conservative. “I’ve read his cases that I’ve seen, I know this judge, I know where his center is,” Lippman said. “I believe (his judicial philosophy) is the same as mine.”

Vincent Bonventre, a New York courts expert and law professor at Albany Law School, made the case in his blog New York Court Watcher that the Cablevision and Evergreen decisions did not support the idea that LaSalle was conservative, nor that he is anti-union and anti-abortion rights. “The court – with LaSalle's vote – was applying, as it must, the precedent set by the Court of Appeals in its 1951 decision in Martin v. Curran,” Bonventre wrote in defense of the Cablevision decision. “Really anti-union or anti-labor?” In a different post, he wrote about a handful of cases that he said contradicted the arguments that opponents have made. The Court of Appeals overturned one of the decisions in the case of People v. Buyund, in which the conservative majority ruled against the opinion while the progressive minority voted to uphold it. “LaSalle in accord with (Judges Rowan) Wilson and (Jenny) Rivera – hard to get less pro-prosecution than that,” Bonventre wrote of the agreement between LaSalle and the two most liberal judges in the Court of Appeals.

Bonventre offered other examples of overlooked cases, just as LaSalle opponents have presented more decisions for consideration as well. While neither represent the totality of LaSalle’s judicial history, the cases certainly offer more for lawmakers to consider beyond the few that his supporters have constituted as the crux of the opposition.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.