New York State

New York’s lawsuit against Exxon Mobil has begun, here’s what it could mean

The state alleges the oil company lied to the public about the risk climate change poses to the company.

A group of protestors gathered outside of a New York City courthouse at the start of a legal case against Exxon Mobile.

A group of protestors gathered outside of a New York City courthouse at the start of a legal case against Exxon Mobile. JUSTIN LANE/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

“Exxon Mobil did nothing wrong – absolutely nothing wrong,” the energy company’s lawyer Theodore Wells Jr. began his opening statement in the densely packed state Supreme Court in New York City on Tuesday, the first day in a landmark case against the world's largest publicly traded oil company.

The groundbreaking civil lawsuit is being brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who alleges that Exxon Mobil deceived investors about the company's management of financial risks posed by climate change. According to the AG’s office – which began the case under James’ predecessor Eric Schneiderman – Exxon falsely represented that it was applying a higher projected carbon cost to its projects than it was actually doing in its own planning and estimations, making its fossil fuel assets seem significantly less risky than they were. By using two different cost estimates, the attorney general alleges, Exxon Mobil underreported billions of dollars in potential costs, downplaying the risk to its investors and bolstering the value of its shares. 

The securities fraud case is the first major case to go to trial against an energy company for climate-related risks and could have far reaching consequences both for future cases against Exxonmobil as well as for the future of internal corporate carbon-pricing.

The case People of the State of New York vs. Exxon Mobil Corporation is different from climate liability cases such as the youth climate lawsuit against the U.S. government, or other climate nuisance cases being brought against Exxon Mobil and other fossil fuel companies. The youth climate lawsuit is alleging the U.S. government, by continuing to promote climate change-causing activities, is harming their constitutional right to life and liberty. A decision on whether this will go to trial is expected soon from the federal appeals court in San Francisco. The climate nuisance lawsuits are going after fossil fuel companies for impeding their full use of public and private property because of climate change. Most of these cases are awaiting various appeals.

Instead, this case presents the possibility that oil, gas and coal companies could be guilty of defrauding investors if they misled the public about how they are managing the current and future risks of climate change to their financial prospects, including increased regulatory burdens like a carbon tax. “That could have both financial as well as political ramifications in terms of generating the political will to address climate change,” said Katrina Fischer Kuh, the Haub Distinguished Professor of Environmental Law at Pace University.

The case began in 2015 when Schneiderman started an investigation into Exxon Mobil's public disclosures over the climate risks to its current and future business practices. Schneiderman used New York's Martin Act, a 1921 anti-fraud law that provides shareholders broad protections from corporate fraud.

“With an act like the Martin Act, you don’t have to show intent to defraud,” Pat Parenteau, Professor of Law at Vermont Law School told City & State in an interview. “If you are so clumsy in communicating the way you are taking risk into account that you literally mislead your investors, confuse them to the point that they really don’t understand what you are doing, how you are taking risk into account, that’s enough to make you liable under the Martin Act. It is that tough. “

Whether James can show that the world’s largest publicly traded oil company was being clumsy, intentionally or not, with assessing, applying, and communicating the climate risk of its investments, is what both sides will be attempting to prove or disprove over the course of the trial that is expected to last three weeks.

Opening with a series of documents from Exxon’s shareholder meetings showing how the company was made aware of the climate risk to its investments, Kevin Wallace, a lawyer from the attorney general’s office, laid out in his six-point oral argument New York’s claim that the world’s largest publicly traded company had “defrauded the public about the impact of carbon regulation on the company’s financial outlook.”

The argument hinges in part on the evidence that shows Exxon anticipated more costly and stringent climate change regulations over the coming decades and signaled to shareholders that it was applying a cost of carbon up to $80 per ton across its business to account for that risk. However the type of numbers used to estimate the risk from climate change and future oil and gas regulation due to climate change – so called “proxy costs” – were much higher for the public than the numbers the company used internally. 

Wells, Exxon Mobil’s lawyer from the prominent New York firm Paul Weiss, dismissed the allegations on Tuesday as a “hypergranular dispute about GHG (Greenhouse Gas) cost assumptions in a cash flow model.” He acknowledged that the company had two sets of carbon costs, a “proxy cost” and a “GHG emissions cost” but said they served two different purposes, one for assessing demand and one for expenses.

Regardless of how hypergranular the dispute may seem to Exxon, experts believe that it will send a signal to investor groups already concerned about the broader risk of climate change on markets.

“It certainly will lead other companies in the fossil fuel business to be much more careful about the way they describe how they are taking the risks of climate regulation into account,” said Parenteau. “I think they are going to have to come up with a standard way of accounting for the risks of the business model they are pursuing, in light of climate change and the increasing impacts of a relatively modest climate warming compared to where we are heading.”

While this case might not set a legal precedent for other kinds of climate liability, the more than 4 million documents uncovered in the discovery process could be useful for future cases against Exxon Mobil, said Parenteau, many of which have been influenced by recent investigations by InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times. These investigations showed that as far back as the 1970s Exxon Mobil’s own researchers were predicting the catastrophic effects of climate change, at the same time the company was engaged in a multimillion-dollar effort to cast doubt on the science and fund misinformation campaigns.

The lawsuit is not directly tied to this climate disinformation campaign, “but it is related to the same idea of a differential between internal corporate sophisticated understanding of the likely impacts and costs of climate change and then a very big delta between that and public representation,” said Kuh.

If Exxon is found to have defrauded the public, the NYAG’s office has estimated the cost of restitution to shareholders to be between $476 million and $1.6 billion. While there are only a few other climate-related securities lawsuits vying to go to trial, this lawsuit adds to a growing number of legal cases attempting to get fossil fuel industries to pay for climate damage and force change through the courts – a move led largely by liberal states under an administration unsympathetic to action on climate change. The trial is expected to take around three weeks and if the verdict is appealed, which experts say is likely, a resolution could take years.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.