Policy

Opinion: ULURP shouldn’t be taken for granted

New York City Council Members should have the goal of saying “yes” to developers going through the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure and affordable housing is at stake.

After some hesitation and later negotiations, New York City Council Member Tiffany Caban through her support behind Halletts North, a 1340-unit complex in Astoria, Queens.

After some hesitation and later negotiations, New York City Council Member Tiffany Caban through her support behind Halletts North, a 1340-unit complex in Astoria, Queens. Credit John McCarten/NYC Council Media Unit

Everyone knew Bruce Teitelbaum would face an uphill battle to get his 917-apartment proposal for 145th Street, One45, through the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure. In its first renditions, One45’s affordability concessions looked like scraps, and the project drew the ire of local New York City Council Member Kristin Richardson Jordan. While Teitelbaum offered hundreds more affordable units when the proposal made it to the City Council, it was not enough to earn Richardson Jordan’s approval. But even after pulling the project in May, he was not finished with the site. In September, he announced, much to the chagrin of everyone, that he was building a truck depot.

Not long after, a similar project’s fate was at the hands of another hard-to-please council member. This time, the developers behind Halletts North, a 1340-unit complex in Astoria, vied for City Council Member Tiffany Cabán’s approval. However, unlike Richardson Jordan, Cabán surprised everyone and backed the project. Despite initial reservations, Cabán negotiated with the developers to get the income levels for the 335 affordable units at or below 80% of the Average Median Income. Instead of a truck depot, Astoria will get hundreds of deeply affordable homes.

Now, another major housing development is heading through the approval process. The fate of Innovation QNS, a 2700-unit redevelopment scheme for Astoria, rests in the hands of City Council Member Julie Won, who has expressed opposition to the plan. Much like Richardson Jordan, Won sees the affordable housing concessions as insufficient. Despite the developers increasing the proportion of affordable units to 40%, Won has demanded that the project contains 55% affordable housing. But this time, Won has seen the consequences of One45’s rejection and Halletts North’s approval. Juxtaposing those outcomes against our city’s worsening housing crisis, it should be clear that with ULURP, the goal must be to get to “yes.”

Most proposals brought to the table are already improvements over what is allowed “as-of-right.” That doesn’t mean it will be good. However, given that any residential rezoning requires at least 20% affordable housing, New Yorkers are already starting with below-market-rate housing on the table. For most areas, 20% is insufficient, but it's more affordable homes than the as-of-right alternative.

And "as-of-right" doesn’t always equate to housing since not all zoning districts permit housing. One45 was in a C8-3 district that allows automotive services, like showrooms, repair shops and depots. Innovation QNS and Halletts North are predominantly in M1-1 districts that permit light manufacturing and industrial services. Neither C8-3 nor M1-1 districts allow for housing as of right. Cabán referenced this point in her support of Halletts North. That risk analysis is something that Won and everyone else needs to perform. Recognizing what developers can build without review should make anyone receptive to discussing rezonings. Without these zoning changes, we get more of what the city doesn’t need and squander housing opportunities.

Debates about affordability and public concessions are both inevitable and necessary. As a negotiation tactic, developers often initially offer the minimum, and oftentimes, adjustments are warranted. (Developers don’t always negotiate in good faith either, so a healthy dose of skepticism is reasonable.) However, we can’t be consumed by artificial rubrics and benchmarks and let them derail the chance for affordable housing. At a certain point, quibbling about percentages becomes useless. If we can move the needle, we should, but we can’t bow out when it doesn’t go as far as we want it. The aspect of financial feasibility also comes into play. Ask for enough concessions, and the project might require additional government subsidies, which defeats the purpose of mandatory inclusionary housing. Fifty-five percent of zero homes means zero affordable homes. Being beholden to affordability benchmarks is not something we can afford to do when the alternative is no affordable housing or no housing at all. 

Additionally, squabbles about other metrics, such as density, are not as necessary. Density reductions are rarely warranted. When they do happen, they result in significant reductions in affordable housing. The focus should be maximizing the amount of housing that gets built, both affordable and market rate. (If anything, density adjustments should result in increases.) Killing a project because it doesn’t reach affordability benchmarks is not ideal, but killing a project because it’s too large is asinine.

We should also want these approvals to happen on the first go-around. ULURP is already a tedious process. It can take up to 215 days to review applications, not including the time projects sit in pre-certification, which can vary significantly. Every time we insist that developers scrap their plans and reapply with a new project, we add months, if not years, to the timeline of new housing. That is also years worth of added costs to housing, which makes affordability more difficult. It is a proposition that developers won’t accept and a gamble the city cannot afford. Good final proposals can come from lackluster applications. The perfect cannot be the enemy of the good.

Not every rezoning will be approved or should be. Rezonings are not appropriate everywhere, and Mandatory Inclusionary Housing has legitimate shortcomings. However, we should want something to be approved. We are building housing at an abysmal pace. Whenever we can increase housing production, we must do so. Initial proposals aren't always ideal, but rejecting those proposals returns us to a status quo that we can no longer accept. 

And even with process improvements and attitude changes, ULURP needs to be reserved for only the most significant neighborhood changes.

ULURP is the city’s primary method of producing privately financed affordable housing when a zoning change is approved and triggers mandatory inclusionary housing. That’s an unsustainable method for producing affordable housing. Not only is the process too tedious for everyone involved, but the resulting projects are close to what as-of-right construction should be. The city is fully capable of making this happen as well. Neighborhood rezonings in high-opportunity areas push us in that direction. State initiatives like lifting the residential 12 floor area ratio cap would also help. ULURP should be a supplementary process where developers go much further above and beyond (literally), not where developers eke out projects that offer the bare minimum of what this city needs. It should still be a part of our solution, but it needs to take a back seat.

Austin Celestin is a junior at New York University studying Urban Design and Journalism.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.