Politics

Don’t blame the maps: analysis suggests different districts wouldn’t have helped Dems much

State Sen. Michael Gianaris doesn’t regret going hard on the maps

Congressional map of New York via Dave's Redistricting

Congressional map of New York via Dave's Redistricting Jeff Coltin

There’s more than enough blame to go around, after New York Democrats’ uniquely weak performance in the Congressional midterm elections. Among those taking heat: state Sen. Michael Gianaris, who oversaw the process that got Congressional maps favorable to Democrats thrown out, and replaced with less friendly ones drawn by a special master. 

But a preliminary analysis of the results shows that the special master’s district maps probably did not play as much of a role in Democrats’ losses as some have assumed. The party may have held just one more seat if state legislators and the governor had settled for a less partisan map. And results were so poor for Democrats this year that even the Legislature’s aggressive lines wouldn’t have been a cure-all. Dems would have likely won just four out of the nine competitive seats – still losing all of Long Island. 

“The data makes clear that the problem on Election Day was a performance issue, not a district issue,” Gianaris, the deputy majority leader, told City & State after reviewing the analysis. “Under any alternative scenario of district lines, you’d have substantially the same results.”

Credit: Jeff Coltin

Analysis obtained by City & State presents the preliminary election night results in nine House races, and looks at how much the Democrat underperformed President Joe Biden’s 2020 performance within the same district lines. Under the special master maps – the ones currently in use – Democrats won just one of the nine competitive races, with Rep. Pat Ryan, in the 18th Congressional District in the Hudson Valley. (The 22nd Congressional District in Central New York has been finalized yet, but Republican Brandon Williams is expected to win.)

If Gianaris and Albany Democrats had instead settled for more competitive Congressional lines, they might have looked like the plan submitted by the Democratic commissioners on the Independent Redistricting Commission. If you extrapolate how much the Democratic nominees underperformed Biden to those district lines, the party might have won two of the nine competitive seats: the 17th Congressional District and the 22nd. 

And if the courts had just accepted the deep blue maps that the Legislature passed and Hochul signed into law? Democratic candidates might have won in the 17th, 18th and 19th Congressional districts in the Hudson Valley as well as the 22nd. But even gerrymandering probably wouldn’t have been enough to save Long Island. Republicans still likely would have won the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Congressional Districts, as well as the 11th Congressional District on Staten Island and Brooklyn. Yes, even Park Slope might not have been able to save Max Rose this year (Though The City’s separate analysis suggests he could have won a narrow victory under that scenario.)

Some caveats are needed. First, statewide electoral district level data is not available yet, and likely will not be for weeks. For now, we need to rely on rough math, rather than specific results of which party people voted for. 

Second, it’s impossible to know what factors might have changed if different district lines were in place. For just one example, Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney might have run in the 18th, rather than the 17th, which could have changed the dynamics, the strategy, the turnout, and ultimately could have changed the results. The analysis only offers insight based on voting patterns that exist because of the districts as they were drawn. 

Third, this is just one election cycle, and these maps will probably be in place for four more. 

And fourth: the balance of power in the House is so thin that every single race may count. Even if the districting debacle resulted in the Democrats losing just one extra seat in New York, that one seat may end up being incredibly consequential. 

And that’s part of why Gianaris is so adamant that he shouldn’t be blamed for trying to draw a map that was as favorable to Democrats as possible. 

“This is the problem with the Democratic Party in New York State. The conclusion that they have reached is that we should have tried less. We should have appeased our opponents. We should have intentionally built a less Democratic map,” he said. “Which would still land you in the situation we are today. That kind of weak approach typifies why we have the problems that we do.”

Publicly, Democrats – particularly progressives – have laid the bulk of the blame at the feet of state Democratic Party Chair Jay Jacobs, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who negotiated the flawed redistricting process a decade ago. Gov. Kathy Hochul’s campaign has also received post mortems expounding on its flaws. But Gianaris, who co-led the redistricting process for the Legislature, has found himself on the receiving end of criticism as well. “Kevin McCarthy is going to be the speaker of the House, and he should send Mike Gianaris flowers. A bouquet,” said one operative at the post-election Somos conference in Puerto Rico. “People who led the redistricting effort should understand that they didn’t follow the rule of the law, and Michael Gianaris, who led the process, is to blame,” former New York City Council Member Elizabeth Crowley told the Daily News. 

In the wake of New York’s congressional red wave, editorial boards were also blunt about Gianaris’ share of blame for Democrats’ spectacular losses. The Daily News called Gianaris’ maps tossed for gerrymandering a “greedy, unconstitutional overreach.” The New York Post dubbed Gianaris “universally seen as the prime mover of New York Dems’ disastrous redistricting debacle,” suggesting that Democrats should aim their ire at him.

Gianaris has quickly and fiercely defended himself since lawmakers first released their congressional maps, and that has continued post election. Now, his defense has gotten a boost. “The critics appear to be those that have a self-interested agenda or are speaking from ignorance,” Gianaris siad. “Any steps back from the maps that we actually passed wouldn’t have yielded substantially different results.”

Gianaris has long used as a defense the flawed redistricting process approved in 2014 under Cuomo and a Republican state Senate. Redistricting expert and New York Law School Professor Jeffrey Wice agreed with Gianaris to an extent. “The redistricting process was designed by Andrew Cuomo and Senate Republicans and was designed to fail,” Wice told City & State. “The fault lies more with the process than with the maps.” Although he has not performed his own post-election analysis of what might have happened with different district lines, Wice said that if the analysis obtained by City & State is accurate, it “goes to show the boogeyman isn‘t the Democratic map that was rejected.”

Cuomo World disagreed with Gianaris and Wice’s framing, leaving out the role of the Democratic-led Assembly, as well as voters.

“Let’s make sure the facts are crystal clear: the constitutional amendment was an agreement with the governor, the Senate and the Democratic Assembly, which not only passed it twice but passed it with 90% of the vote, and then it was overwhelmingly approved by New Yorkers,” said Rich Azzopardi, a spokesperson for Cuomo, in a statement sent after this article was initially published. “If Albany pols are looking for someone to blame for this debacle, there are plenty of mirrors in this town.” 

Gianaris has also pointed to the fact that the congressional lines were thrown out over procedure in addition to gerrymandering, effectively making the alleged partisan drawing moot. But a mid-level state court that called the legislative procedure appropriate also upheld the original ruling on unconstitutional gerrymandering, suggesting that the lines drawn by lawmakers may have been doomed to fail even if the Legislature went about their task differently. 

Still, the new analysis helps give credence to Gianaris’ assertion that he is not to blame for Democrats’ losses in New York, and potentially the party’s loss of the House. And others, for one, seem inclined to agree with him. “Dems lost *five* NY seats that voted for Biden by more than the national result in ‘20 - including two that voted for Biden by double digits,” Cook Political Report’s David Wasserman said in a tweet Sunday. “You can’t really blame that on bad redistricting.”

Editor's note: This story was updated to include comment from former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s spokesperson.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.